January has flown by, and I am still working on the same dishcloths and sock yarn hat--no matter how quickly I knit, I feel like there's an impish little gremlin who unknits my stitches when I take a sip of tea. Our snow is already gone, it's going to be sixty degrees tomorrow (!!!) and there are only four episodes of Downton Abbey left forever and ever. I'm not dealing well with any of this.
Anyway, last week I whipped up a quick table runner for the dining room. My stash is quite low right now and would lend itself fabulously to a decent scrappy quilt (so I could then buy more fabric without any guilt), but I did have a few pieces that were just the right size for this. It's just a wholecloth quilt, nothing fancy at all. Sorry for the picture quality--I don't think I'll ever take good pictures in low light.
I'm kind of overly pleased with myself as I eyeballed all of that quilting. I used the little dotty centers as my reference (they were only an inch apart, but that's plenty of room to go crooked--trust me, haha), and everything came out straighter than the lines I tried indenting with my hera marker. Go figure.
When I started this, all I could see were the little green ovals that made up the mini cathedral windows. When I quilted it, all I could then see were the white centers, and it looked very tufted. I thought it might have something to do with the straight line quilting having an illusory effect on the curves. I thought "Wow, I can't wait to take a picture of this!" and then when I did the effect was gone, and now all I can see are the green ovals again (and I don't mean in the photos, I mean in real life, as I'm looking at it right now as I type).
I made this for the dining room table, and as it's an oval shape I wanted to mimic that. I ended up having to go with a rounded rectangle, as geometry is not my strong suit and disaster was on the horizon. The curves do look much better than the harsh rectangular corners I usually do. It also saved a bit of time as I didn't have to stop and miter anything--it all went on so nice and smooth and stayed that way. I definitely want to try this on other quilts.
I didn't have enough batting, so I used a piece of sew-in fleece. It worked fine, but I'll just have to remember not to put this in the dryer. I used linen for the binding, and wanted to use one of my fancy stitches for it. I saw one that I thought went well with the fabric, but it came out looking like the above. At least it's consistent, so it doesn't look wrong, just like a weird stitch. Here's what it was supposed to look like (but not in red):
Wouldn't that have looked cute? I had a terrible feeling something was wrong with my machine and that I would have to lug that monster to the repair shop and pay heaven knows what to have it fixed. But apparently what I should have done is use the suggested presser foot. I used my walking foot, and I believe that combined with the slight roughness of linen made everything go a little haywire. When I used the recommended foot it came out just as it was supposed to. Lesson learned. At least I didn't have to pick out all of those stitches as it does look like I meant to do it.
I am just super happy with my quilting. The stitch length was right, I didn't sew cross-eyed, and gridded quilting always gives this amazing texture that I love.
So that's it. Nothing much. It's been mostly spaghetti knitting (you know, the more you do the more you feel like you have to do, like eating a bowl of spaghetti) and my new time-sucker (it's not quite an obsession yet). When I can grab a few minutes of decent light I'll show you some pictures of my feeble attempts at this new interest.
I actually think it's quite clever. I am using up some of my yarn at the moment (and not a minute too soon, my husband would say... ha!)
ReplyDeleteI find that the pattern stitches sometimes look odd on quilted fabric. Your quilting looks excellent, beautiful straight lines!
ReplyDeleteI find that the pattern stitches sometimes look odd on quilted fabric. Your quilting looks excellent, beautiful straight lines!
ReplyDeleteYour quilting is beautiful Bethany. I learned the hard way too once using my walking foot for a decorative stitch. I realized that a walking foot is only meant to go forward with straight or a standard zigzag stitch, but those fancy stitches sometimes go forward and then back and right and left , etc. That's why you can't use your walking foot for fancy stitches if you want them to look correct because a walking foot won't go backwards.
ReplyDeleteGreat job quilting the runner Bethany! I have been keeping pretty busy in my sewing room lately. I have a class tomorrow at my local quilt shop too. Fun stuff!
ReplyDeletexo Kris
That turned out really nice! I LOVE the linen binding, and the decorative stitching looks neat even if it's not how it was supposed to look.
ReplyDeleteThat's lovely Bethany. The binding is very good and the overall look is pleasing. So which foot did you use? I think I would have opted for the walking foot too.
ReplyDeleteI was supposed to use the...I think it's the satin stitch foot? It's never seemed to sew differently than my standard foot so I don't usually use it, but I did to test things out and it seemed to do the job. Or would have if I had "hired" it in time, haha.
DeleteThat's lovely Bethany. The binding is very good and the overall look is pleasing. So which foot did you use? I think I would have opted for the walking foot too.
ReplyDelete